Within non-trivial technical projects, it helps to have a common language to describe "good":
- It enables cross-feature comparisons and prioritization.
- It facilitates conversations between stakeholders, business and developers.
This page suggests a feature quality scale, along with how it can be applied.
Quality scale
A quality scale can be applied to:
- Business goals, stakeholder needs, features, quality, schedule, maintenance, and more ...
User experience | Description | Requires | |
Qx | Over-deliver | * Functionality cannot be noticed or used by the user. | |
Q5 | Delight | * Anticipate user desires, and provide it. | * Understand the user’s desires and passions. |
Q4 | Impress | * Anticipate user unanticipated needs, and provide it. | * Analyze the user behaviors and needs. * Understand the product capabilities. * Establish critical user journeys. |
Q3 | Satisfy | * Meet user’s known wants. | * Listen to the user’s asks. |
Q2 | Underperform | * Under specified or poorly implemented. * User experience includes many micro-frustrations. |
* Meet purchasing authority’s specification. * Cost saving implementation. * Minimal testing. |
Q1 | Not practically functional | * While the product “works” the experience is so poor that the user chooses to use something else if available. | |
Q0 | Broken | * Functionality doesn’t work at all. |
Possible quality scale
Quality categories for each feature
For each feature, a project can define quality categories.
Feature | Delight | Impress | Satisfy | Underperform | Not practically functional | Broken |
On/off button | Works | Fails | ||||
Waterproof to | > 100m | > 10m | > 1m | < 1m | ||
Uptime | > 99.999% | > 99.99% | > 99.9% | > 99% | > 90% | < 90% |
Example quality criteria
Note: Many features won't need the full scale.
Phase exit criteria
The importance of each quality criteria will vary depending upon:
- Different products.
- Different features.
- Different development phases: alpha, staging for test, production/stable release.
Phase: Alpha release
Feature | Priority | Should | Must | Error tolerance |
On/off button | P1 | Satisfy | Satisfy | Satisfy |
Waterproof | P3 | Impress | Underperform | Broken |
Uptime | P2 | Impress | Satisfy | Underperform |
Example phase exit criteria
As requirements
The criteria can be converted into traditional requirements:
The device | should | be waterproof to 100m. |
The device | must | be waterproof to 1m. |
Bug severity levels
Terminology from the quality scale can be aligned with bug severity levels. Severity can be driven by impact to the user, or impact to the business.
Severity | User Impact | Business Impact |
S4 Trivial | * P3 feature underperforms | * Person days to fix. |
S3 Minor | * P3 feature is broken * P2 feature underperforms |
* Person weeks to fix. |
S2 Major | * P1 feature is broken, with work-around * P2 feature is broken, no work-around |
* Person months to fix. |
S1 Critical | * P1 feature is broken. No work-around. | * Upcoming releases blocked until fix provided. |
Example severity scale
No comments:
Post a Comment